- Published on
Tesla in-cabin camera fails to prevent 60 mph naps as Wisk Aero faces lawsuit
- Authors
- Name
- DeepHorus
Tesla's in-cabin driver monitoring camera has failed to prevent a serious safety incident, with a woman reportedly falling asleep while driving at 100 km/h. The incident raises questions about the effectiveness of Tesla's attention monitoring system, which is designed to ensure driver engagement during Full Self-Driving (FSD) operation. This failure underscores the challenges of relying on current technology to enforce driver attentiveness.
Tesla has increasingly relied on in-cabin cameras to monitor driver attentiveness, particularly when using its FSD Beta feature. The system is supposed to detect if a driver is asleep or distracted and issue warnings. However, reports indicate that the camera can be easily defeated by covering it or using other methods, undermining its safety purpose. This vulnerability has been known for some time but remains unaddressed.
According to reports, the driver was caught napping at highway speeds, yet the camera failed to intervene. This incident is not isolated; Tesla's FSD system has faced scrutiny for allowing drivers to disengage from monitoring. Furthermore, leaked Tesla app code suggests the cabin camera may soon be used to verify driver identity before enabling FSD, indicating a shift toward broader surveillance rather than just attention detection.
The failure highlights the limitations of current driver monitoring technology. If Tesla plans to deploy self-driving taxis like the Cybercab, robust monitoring is critical. However, if the camera can be bypassed, it undermines safety and regulatory compliance. The incident could also attract regulatory attention regarding Tesla's claims about FSD capabilities and the effectiveness of its safeguards.
Public reaction has been critical, with safety advocates calling for stronger oversight. Meanwhile, Tesla has not commented on the specific incident. In a separate development, Boeing-backed Wisk Aero is facing a lawsuit from a former employee who alleges wrongful termination for reporting software concerns in its autonomous eVTOL air taxi. The lawsuit claims that Wisk rushed software testing for its 6th generation vehicle, potentially compromising safety.
The future of in-cabin cameras may extend beyond monitoring to include driver verification and potentially insurance purposes. However, until systems are foolproof, the risk of driver misuse remains. Both Tesla and Wisk Aero must address these safety concerns to gain public trust and regulatory approval for their autonomous vehicle programs. The industry must confront the reality that current technologies may not be sufficient to ensure safe operation without human vigilance.
