- Published on
Doctors die. It's not like the rest of us, but it should be (2016)
- Authors

- Name
- DeepHorus
A retired Los Angeles family doctor, Ken Murray, sparked a crucial conversation in 2016 about how physicians approach end-of-life care. Unlike the general public, doctors often choose minimal medical intervention when facing terminal illness, preferring quality of life over aggressive treatment. This hard-hitting insight from Murray's blogpost revealed a stark contrast between the care doctors prescribe for others and what they would want for themselves.
Murray recounted the story of Charlie, a highly respected orthopaedist and mentor, who discovered a lump in his abdomen. Diagnosed with pancreatic cancer, Charlie was offered a new surgical procedure that could triple his five-year survival odds from 5% to 15%, albeit with a poor quality of life. Uninterested in such a trade-off, Charlie went home the next day, closed his practice, and never returned to a hospital. He died several months later at home, without chemotherapy, radiation, or surgery, costing Medicare very little.
This case exemplifies a broader pattern among medical professionals: they tend to die gently, knowing the limits of modern medicine. Many physicians wear medallions or tattoos stamped 'NO CODE' to ensure that cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is not performed on them. They have witnessed futile care, where terminally ill patients are subjected to painful procedures, hooked up to machines, and kept in intensive care units at enormous cost, often suffering needlessly.
The implications of such care are profound. Physicians frequently administer treatments they would never choose for themselves, driven by patient families who, shocked and overwhelmed, say 'do everything' without understanding the consequences. This dissonance takes a toll: doctors have higher rates of alcohol abuse and depression than most other professionals. As Murray noted, 'To administer medical care that makes people suffer is anguishing.'
From the perspective of doctors, the solution lies in better communication and advance care planning. They urge families to have honest conversations about end-of-life wishes before a crisis strikes. Murray himself stopped participating in hospital care during his last decade of practice, partly due to the emotional burden of delivering futile treatments.
Looking ahead, Murray's blogpost serves as a call to action. It highlights the need for a healthcare system that respects patients' true preferences, not just default aggressive measures. As more people become aware of how doctors choose to die, they may feel empowered to make similar choices. The ultimate lesson: dying with dignity often means knowing when to let go.