- Published on
EU Exempts Apple Watch and AirPods from Battery Removal Requirements
- Authors
- Name
- DeepHorus
The European Commission yesterday adopted new exemptions to its Batteries Regulation, freeing the Apple Watch and AirPods from the requirement to have user-removable and replaceable batteries. These devices join the iPhone, which was already exempt under the original regulation due to its battery cycle life and water resistance rating. The move reflects a broader trend of regulatory flexibility for compact, sealed electronics.
The Batteries Regulation, intended to reduce electronic waste and promote repairability, mandates that batteries in most consumer electronics be easily removable by users. However, the Commission recognized that certain products pose unique challenges. The reasoning for exemptions largely mirrors that applied to devices like electric toothbrushes: opening a compact, sealed enclosure and failing to reseal it properly could allow water ingress, creating a safety risk. Products can also qualify if their construction makes battery removal inherently dangerous or if there is no realistic way to build in user access given current manufacturing methods.
Under the new exemptions, Apple Watch and AirPods are freed from the removability rule. The iPhone already enjoyed an exemption under the original regulation, citing its battery cycle life and water resistance. These exemptions apply specifically to devices where the design constraints outweigh the benefits of user-replaceable batteries, as determined by the Commission.
The implications of these exemptions are significant for both consumers and the environment. Environmental advocates argue that sealed batteries in devices like earbuds and smart watches contribute to e-waste, as the entire product often must be discarded when the battery degrades. One reader comment noted that PowerBeats Pro earbuds lasted only two years due to battery failure, forcing replacement of a $250 device. Others pointed out that competitors like Nintendo have introduced replaceable batteries in some products, and Google's Pixel Watch 4 features a user-replaceable battery, suggesting that exemptions may not be necessary for all compact devices.
Reactions to the exemptions have been mixed. Some critics view the regulation as largely pointless, with one commenter stating, 'most products it might have applied to are now exempt,' questioning the resources spent on its development. Others defended the regulation, noting that it has driven positive changes, such as Nintendo's compliance. However, the exemption for Apple Watch and AirPods has sparked debate over whether the EU should incentivize replaceable batteries even when exemptions apply, to reduce environmental harm.
Looking ahead, the Commission's exemption decision must still undergo scrutiny by the European Parliament and the Council of the EU. If approved, the exemptions will take effect, but the broader regulatory landscape remains in flux. The EU may face pressure to close loopholes or introduce additional incentives for replaceable batteries in future revisions of the Batteries Regulation. For now, Apple Watch and AirPods users will not see changes, but the debate over e-waste and repairability continues.
