DeepHorus is an innovative tech media and intelligence platform focused on AI, blockchain, startups, and emerging technologies.
Published on

Massachusetts Mandates Clean Energy for Large Data Centers as Backlash Grows

Authors
  • avatar
    Name
    DeepHorus
    Twitter

Massachusetts has become the third state in recent months to restrict data center development. Governor Maura Healey signed an executive order on September 10, 2026, requiring large facilities to use clean energy. Data centers larger than 25 megawatts must supply 100 percent of their electricity from clean sources or contribute to a ratepayer protection fund. The mandate responds to mounting public opposition over rising energy costs and grid strain.

The order places Massachusetts alongside Texas and New York, which imposed similar restrictions in August and July respectively. It goes beyond the state's existing clean energy standard, which only required a portion of power from approved sources such as wind, solar, and hydro. Developers can meet the new requirement by generating clean power on-site or funding nearby generation projects.

The state is also discouraging communities from signing non-disclosure agreements with developers and has paused a recently enacted data center sales tax exemption. These measures aim to increase transparency and reduce the financial burden on residents. The ratepayer protection fund is designed to shield households from potential electricity price increases caused by data center demand.

The implications for the AI industry are significant, as data center operators face higher compliance costs and potential delays. The move signals that states are no longer willing to offer incentives without strong environmental and consumer protections. This could slow the pace of AI infrastructure expansion in the region.

In response, the AI industry has begun pushing back politically. The pro-AI super PAC Leading the Future, backed by Marc Andreessen, Ben Horowitz, and Greg Brockman, is running advertisements aimed at influencing voters in battleground states ahead of the midterm elections. This political effort reflects growing tension between state regulators and technology companies.

Looking ahead, more states may adopt similar mandates as public concern grows. The midterm elections could shape federal policy for AI infrastructure. Developers may need to integrate clean energy investments into their business models to secure approval in cautious markets.