- Published on
Who needs CLARITY anyway? ARB could see 70X increase: Hodler’s Digest
- Authors
- Name
- DeepHorus
In a week of dramatic regulatory developments, the crypto industry faced a pivotal setback with the failed Senate vote on the CLARITY Act, yet simultaneously saw significant progress through regulatory actions and legislative proposals. The Digital Asset Market Clarity Act, intended to provide a comprehensive regulatory framework for cryptocurrencies, failed to advance past a crucial procedural vote, receiving only 49 votes in favor versus 50 against, falling short of the required 60-vote threshold. This legislative defeat marks the culmination of a year-long effort to establish clear rules for the U.S. crypto market, leaving the industry in continued regulatory limbo. Despite this, Senator Thom Tillis’s strategic ‘no’ vote, intended to preserve the option for a future vote, offers a sliver of hope, though legislative observers remain skeptical of its near-term prospects.
The failure comes amid a tight legislative calendar, with Congressman Shri Thanedar, a Democratic supporter of the bill, pointing to the mere 20 legislative days remaining in the current Congress as a major barrier. This timeline severely limits the window for negotiating a compromise, especially with midterms looming. Seven Democratic senators who initially opposed the bill expressed continued commitment to its eventual passage, but blamed Republican leadership for abruptly shutting down last-minute deal-making. Legal experts like NEAR’s Abhishek Vaidyanathan have concluded that the next Congress will now be the likely opportunity to revisit crypto market structure legislation, highlighting the practical realities that have doomed the bill for this session.
In the immediate aftermath, U.S. regulators stepped in to fill the legislative vacuum, with the SEC announcing a significant five-year exemption allowing limited trading of tokenized U.S. stocks on public blockchains. This Innovation Exemption permits the use of automated market makers for these trades, waiving the requirement for these protocols to register as securities exchanges. However, the relief is narrowly tailored and excludes ‘synthetic’ stock tokens that do not confer full shareholder rights, effectively disqualifying many existing products from issuers like xStocks and Robinhood. This move suggests regulators are proceeding cautiously with targeted measures rather than waiting for comprehensive legislation.
Similarly, the CFTC issued regulatory relief for ‘passive software’ providers, such as wallets, that connect users to regulated derivatives exchanges, stating it will not recommend enforcement against them for failing to register as brokers. This no-action position could dramatically lower barriers for crypto applications to offer access to perpetual contracts and prediction markets. The CFTC has also submitted draft crypto regulations to the White House, currently at the pre-rule stage, signaling further regulatory activity on the horizon. Major platforms like Coinbase and Kalshi are already positioning themselves within this evolving framework by filing applications to offer perpetual futures on U.S. stocks.
The broader context reveals a bifurcated path for the U.S. crypto industry. While comprehensive legislation has stalled, targeted regulatory carve-outs are advancing innovation in specific areas like tokenized assets and derivatives access. Simultaneously, a significant pro-crypto policy milestone was achieved as the House Financial Services Committee passed the American Reserve Modernization Act, which would formalize the Strategic Bitcoin Reserve into law. This legislative victory, combined with Standard Chartered’s bullish 70x price projection for Arbitrum by 2030, underscores the industry’s resilience and long-term growth trajectory despite immediate political hurdles. The coming months will test whether this patchwork of regulatory guidance can sustain market confidence until a new Congress can address the foundational market structure issues.
