DeepHorus is an innovative tech media and intelligence platform focused on AI, blockchain, startups, and emerging technologies.
Published on

Ethereum investors are stuck in a two-week staking exit line. Here's why

Authors
  • avatar
    Name
    DeepHorus
    Twitter

Ethereum’s staking exit queue reached its longest point of 2026 after MetaMask withdrew validators following a security incident. Ether waiting to leave surged more than fivefold in three days to about 851,000 ETH on Oct. 2. MetaMask said no wallets or customer funds appeared affected.

About 786,000 ETH, worth just over $2 billion, remained queued on Monday, with an estimated wait of nearly 14 days. That was up from 166,000 ETH on Sept. 29 and above the roughly 476,000 ETH recorded during a May surge. It equaled about 2% of Ethereum’s 43.6 million staked ETH.

Ethereum restricts how quickly validators can join or leave because they validate transactions and secure the network. Current limits allow about 57,600 ETH to enter and exit daily, so large movements accumulate in queues. Exited ether must also undergo a separate withdrawal process before reaching wallets.

Most of the increase came from MetaMask, which operates validators for Lido, which pools ether for staking. Researcher Kaden estimated the exits covered about 17,000 validators holding 523,000 ETH, though MetaMask did not confirm that figure. MetaMask disclosed the incident on Sept. 30 and said on Oct. 1 that affected validators were going offline.

Lido expects the ether to be restaked after validators depart, balances are withdrawn and coins re-enter the process, which could take 45 days. It expected the last affected validators to stop staking by Oct. 7 and said stETH holders required no action. Offline validators will miss rewards, making the move a temporary operational detour.

Separately, about 1.5 million ETH, worth roughly $4 billion, was waiting to enter staking on Monday, with an estimated wait of 25 days. That was down from around 2 million ETH and 35 days in early September. The divergence indicates no comparable rise in new staking demand offset the exit surge.